Illegal appointments case: Lahore court reserves decision on ACE’s plea for Parvez Elahi’s physical remand – Pakistan


A Lahore district court on Sunday reserved its decision on a request from the Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) for PTI President Parvez Elahi’s physical remand in a case pertaining to unlawful recruitments within the Punjab Assembly.

Elahi was introduced earlier than the court by ACE officers amid tight safety after he was re-arrested for the second time in two days on Saturday.

Judicial Magistrate Ghulam Murtaza Virk was listening to ACE’s request for Elahi’s physical remand.

According to an ACE spokesperson, the case of the unlawful appointments alleges that Elahi recruited 12 Grade-17 officers within the Punjab Assembly in opposition to advantage.

“He bought modified the outcomes of those candidates belonging to Gujrat and Mandi Bahauddin. We have collected proof and likewise arrested Secretary Punjab Assembly Rai Mumtaz Hussain on this regard,” he instructed Dawn.

The listening to

At the outset of right this moment’s listening to, the ACE expressed a insecurity in judicial Justice of the Peace Virk, with the institution’s director basic (DG), Jam Salahuddin, saying they’d obtained directions that he shouldn’t hear the case.

For his half, the choose stated, “A marketing campaign is being run in opposition to me. I don’t have any account on Facebook. I don’t have any account on social media.”

The context of this dialog stays unclear.

Following this trade, the ACE official instructed the Justice of the Peace that they wanted a while to file their request with a classes choose for altering the choose on this case.

“I’ve obtained the directions and we’ll submit a request to a classes choose, however we’d like a while for that,” he stated.

At that, Elahi’s lawyer, Rana Intizar, argued that the court timings have been about to finish and stated they’d get a case registered in opposition to the ACE DG if Elahi was “taken away once more right this moment”.

Then, on the ACE DG’s request, choose Virk suspended the session for some time.

After the listening to resumed, the ACE’s authorized counsel introduced his arguments upon which the choose stated that the FIR talked about the outcomes of Open Testing Service have been modified.

“Where are these modified papers?” he requested.

The ACE counsel stated the outcomes of the testing service have been “tampered” with and have been nonetheless obtainable on-line.

Then Elahi’s lawyer started presenting his arguments, saying that Punjab Assembly Secretary Rai Mumtaz, who was additionally arrested within the case yesterday, needed to say one thing.

Upon the Justice of the Peace’s assent, Rai instructed the court that he was the coordination secretary within the provincial legislature on the time when the alleged unlawful appointments have been made to it.

“I used to be strolling final night time after I was picked up. I used to be blindfolded and brought round. They took me to a spot the place the DG anti-corruption was current.

“He (ACE DG) stated, ‘Do you need to stay in your place?’ When I stated sure, he compelled me into changing into a witness. My testimony was forcefully recorded from me, and I couldn’t sleep all night time.”

At one level throughout the listening to, the choose addressed the ACE’s reservation about him listening to the case, saying he was the identical choose who had granted physical remand of PTI employees and but right this moment there was a problem being raised about him presiding over the case.

“If you don’t like my decision, you possibly can problem it,” he stated.

While conversing with the choose, the ACE’s lawyer contented that contenders scoring 60 marks have been failed and people with merely an rating of eight have been handed.

“All this proof is on file and we’d like Elahi’s 14-day physical remand,” he stated.

Presenting his arguments, Elahi’s lawyer contended there was no different allegation in opposition to his shopper other than altering within the take a look at outcomes. He stated the Punjab Assembly speaker had the precise to nominate anybody, including that the OTS was nonetheless purposeful and couldn’t be questioned.

He stated candidates had appeared for exams after which their outcomes have been despatched to the Punjab Assembly secretary, interviews have been carried out on the premise of advantage and becoming a member of letters have been issued to those that handed.

“Those who have been appointed are nonetheless working. Had there been any downside, they’d’ve been stopped from working,” he stated, including that no proof was introduced in court in opposition to his shopper. He requested the court to discharge Elahi from the case.

The choose subsequently reserved his decision on ACE’s request for Elahi’s physical remand.

arrested by ACE officers from outdoors his residence on June 1 in a corruption case. However, the court termed prices in opposition to Elahi not “effectively-based” and discharged him.

Soon after his discharge, Elahi was taken into custody once more by anti-corruption officers in two instances — registered in Gujranwala — accusing him of inflicting a lack of Rs100 million to the nationwide exchequer and receiving kickbacks throughout his time as Punjab chief govt.

On Saturday, Elahi was produced earlier than Judicial Magistrate Mohammad Afzal’s court in Gujranwala. After the arguments from the ACE and Elahi’s legal professionals, the court discharged the PTI president in each instances and ordered his quick launch if he was not required in another case.

But the PTI president was arrested but once more eluded of his liberty and arrested for “unlawful recruitments” within the Punjab Assembly.

ACE Director General Sohail Zafar Chattha stated Elahi had been discharged in two corruption instances on “technical grounds” by the judicial Justice of the Peace Gujranwala that there was no mechanism to arrest a chief minister.

“The ACE has noticed all authorized and codal formalities for initiation of the inquiry and subsequent arrest of the previous chief minister. There was no violation of any regulation or guidelines. The ACE will file an attraction in opposition to the judgment to discharge the accused as there may be sturdy proof of corruption within the undertaking in opposition to him,” Chattha added.

Leave a Comment